<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Twitter hot or cool?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.metaroll.com/2008/07/26/is-twitter-hot-or-cool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.metaroll.com/2008/07/26/is-twitter-hot-or-cool/</link>
	<description>by benedikt koehler</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: luke</title>
		<link>http://blog.metaroll.com/2008/07/26/is-twitter-hot-or-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eigenarbeit.org/electronic/?p=3#comment-146</guid>
		<description>The Hot and cool scale was supposed to be just that, a sliding scale not polarized extremes ... all media fit somewhere on this scale not at one end or another. For what it's worth i'd go along with the article and say it was somewhere closer to cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hot and cool scale was supposed to be just that, a sliding scale not polarized extremes &#8230; all media fit somewhere on this scale not at one end or another. For what it&#8217;s worth i&#8217;d go along with the article and say it was somewhere closer to cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benedikt</title>
		<link>http://blog.metaroll.com/2008/07/26/is-twitter-hot-or-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Benedikt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eigenarbeit.org/electronic/?p=3#comment-6</guid>
		<description>@Till: Generally this distinction is about the involvement different kinds of media produce. Recent research on brain activity, so I have heard, seem to support this. But the more important question is: What does this tell us about Twitter and Social Media?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Till: Generally this distinction is about the involvement different kinds of media produce. Recent research on brain activity, so I have heard, seem to support this. But the more important question is: What does this tell us about Twitter and Social Media?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Till</title>
		<link>http://blog.metaroll.com/2008/07/26/is-twitter-hot-or-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Till</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eigenarbeit.org/electronic/?p=3#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Isn't the real question if McLuhans distinction between hot and cold media is useful anymore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the real question if McLuhans distinction between hot and cold media is useful anymore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

